POSTS SIND UNGEPRÜFT! - RECHERCHE FEHLT

Dienstag, 15. Juli 2014

Cancer in a Can: The Shocking True Story of how Pringles are Made

http://www.realfarmacy.com/cancer-in-a-can-the-shocking-true-story-of-how-pringles-are-made/

Cancer in a Can: The Shocking True Story of how Pringles are Made

JUL 2 • "FOOD" TO AVOIDARTICLESGMOS • 21762 VIEWS • COMMENTS

facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail
Pringles_chipsby DR. MERCOLA
To understand the nature of Pringles and other stackable chips, forget the notion that they come from actual potatoes in any recognizable way.
AT-M Ad 

The Pringles Company (in an effort to avoid taxes levied against “luxury foods” like chips in the UK) once even argued that the potato content of their chips was so low that they are technically not even potato chips.

So if they’re not made of potatoes, what are they exactly?

The process begins with a slurry of rice, wheat, corn, and potato flakes that are pressed into shape.

This dough-like substance is then rolled out into an ultra-thin sheet cut into chip-cookies by a machine.

“The chips move forward on a conveyor belt until they’re pressed onto molds, which give them the curve that makes them fit into one another.

Those molds move through boiling oil … Then they’re blown dry, sprayed with powdered flavors, and at last, flipped onto a slower-moving conveyor belt in a way that allows them to stack.

From then on, it’s into the cans … and off towards the innocent mouths of the consumers.”

I suspect nearly everyone reading this likely enjoys the taste of potato chips. However, they are clearly one of the most toxic processed foods you can eat—whether they’re made from actual potato shavings or not.

Potato Chips are Loaded with Cancer-Causing Chemical

One of the most hazardous ingredients in potato chips is not intentionally added, but rather is a byproduct of the processing.

Acrylamide, a cancer-causing and potentially neurotoxic chemical, is created when carbohydrate-rich foods are cooked at high temperatures, whether baked, fried, roasted or toasted. Some of the worst offenders include potato chips and French fries, but many foods cooked or processed at temperatures above 212°F (100°C) may contain acrylamide. As a general rule, the chemical is formed when food is heated enough to produce a fairly dry and brown/yellow surface. Hence, it can be found in:
  • -Potatoes: chips, French fries and other roasted or fried potato foods
  • -Grains: bread crust, toast, crisp bread, roasted breakfast cereals and various processed snacks
  • -Coffee; roasted coffee beans and ground coffee powder. Surprisingly, coffee substitutes based on chicory actually contains 2-3 times MORE acrylamide than real coffee.

How Much Acrylamide are You Consuming?

The federal limit for acrylamide in drinking water is 0.5 parts per billion, or about 0.12 micrograms in an eight-ounce glass of water. However, a six-ounce serving of French fries can contain 60 micrograms of acrylamide, or about FIVE HUNDRED times over the allowable limit.

Similarly, potato chips are notoriously high in this dangerous chemical. So high, in fact, that in 2005 the state of California actually sued potato chip makers for failing to warn California consumers about the health risks of acrylamide in their products. A settlement was reached in 2008 when Frito-Lay and several other potato chip makers agreed to reduce the acrylamide levels in their chips to 275 parts per billion (ppb) by 2011, which is low enough to avoid needing a cancer warning label.

The 2005 report “How Potato Chips Stack Up: Levels of Cancer-Causing Acrylamide in Popular Brands of Potato Chips,” issued by the California-based Environmental Law Foundation (ELF), spelled out the dangers of this popular snack. Their analysis found that all potato chip products tested exceeded the legal limit of acrylamide by a minimum of 39 times, and as much as 910 times! Some of the worst offenders at that time included:
  • -Cape Cod Robust Russet: 910 times the legal limit of acrylamide
  • -Kettle Chips (lightly salted): 505 times
  • -Kettle Chips (honey dijon): 495 times

Beware: Baked Chips May Be WORSE than Fried!

If you think you can avoid the health risks of potato chips by choosing baked varieties, which are typically advertised as being “healthier,” think again. Remember that acrylamide is formed not only when foods are fried or broiled, but also when they are baked. And according to U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data on acrylamide levels in foods, baked chips may contain more than three times the level of acrylamide as regular chips!

Interestingly, the same trend holds true for other foods, too, which suggests that baking processed potatoes at high temperature may be one of the worst ways to cook them. For instance, according to the FDA’s data, Ore Ida Golden Fries contained 107 ppb of acrylamide in the regular fried version and 1,098 when baked. So remember, ALL potato chips contain acrylamide, regardless of whether they are natural or not; baked or fried. Likewise, they will ALL influence your insulin levels in a very negative way.

Acrylamide is Not the Only Danger

Acrylamide is not the only dangerous genotoxic compound formed when food is heated to high temperatures.

A three-year long EU project, known as Heat-Generated Food Toxicants (HEATOX)whose findings were published at the end of 2007, found there are more than 800 heat-induced compounds, of which 52 are potential carcinogens. In addition to their finding that acrylamide does pose a public health threat, the HEATOX scientists also discovered that you’re far less likely to ingest dangerous levels of the toxin when you eat home-cooked foods compared to industrially or restaurant-prepared foods.

Additionally, the HEATOX findings also suggest that although there are ways to decrease exposure to acrylamide, it cannot be eliminated completely.

According to their calculations, successful application of all presently known methods would reduce the acrylamide intake by40 percent at the most—which makes me wonder whether chip manufacturers have really succeeded at this point in reducing acrylamide levels to within legal limits… There’s no updated data as of yet, so there’s no telling whether they’ve been able to comply with the 2005 settlement.

For more in-depth information about acrylamide, I recommend reading the online report Heat-generated Food Toxicants, Identification, Characterization and Risk Minimization.  In general however, just remember that cooking food at high temperatures is ill advised. A few of the most well-known toxins created in high-temperature cooking include:
  • -Heterocyclic Amines (HCAs): These form when meat is cooked at high temperatures, and they’re also linked to cancer. In terms of HCA, the worst part of the meat is the blackened section, which is why you should always avoid charring your meat, and never eat blackened sections.
  • -Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): When fat drips onto the heat source, causing excess smoke, and the smoke surrounds your food, it can transfer cancer-causing PAHs to the meat.
  • -Advanced Glycation End Products (AGEs): When food is cooked at high temperatures (including when it is pasteurized or sterilized), it increases the formation of AGEs in your food. When you eat the food, it transfers the AGEs into your body. AGEs build up in your body over time leading to oxidative stress, inflammation and an increased risk of heart disease, diabetes and kidney disease.

The Search for a “Healthful” Chip Continues…

Like a modern-day search for the Holy Grail, chip manufacturers keep searching for methods to improve the image of their health-harming but profitable snacks. For example, by the end of 2011, about half of Pepsi’s Frito-Lay brand snacks will be reformulated with all-natural ingredients. The switch is part of PepsiCo’s master plan to tap into the healthy foods market share. The Wall Street Journal recently reported the company hopes to boost their nutrition business from $10 billion to $30 billion by 2020.

The company will remove dietary hazards like monosodium glutamate (MSG), replacing it with natural seasonings, such as molasses and paprika. Artificial colors will be replaced with beet juice, purple cabbage and carrots. All in all, about different 60 snacks are scheduled to get an all-natural makeover.

This is certainly a good example of how consumer demand can alter the direction of food manufacturers in a positive way.

The reformulated chips may end up being less bad for you than the original formulations. However, chips will never be truly healthful. All-natural chips may be the lesser of two evils, but if consumed regularly, they will still push your health in the wrong direction… There’s no getting away from the fact that modern plagues such as cancer, heart disease, obesity, and diabetes have a dietary component, and potato chips and French fries will always be a losing bet if you want to avoid becoming another disease statistic.

How to Avoid Heat-Induced Toxins in Your Diet

Ideally, you should consume foods that are raw or minimally processed to avoid these types of toxic byproducts—the more raw food, the better. My nutrition plan emphasizes the need for at least one-third of your foods to be consumed raw. Personally, I consume about 80 percent of my food raw, and I find it is one of the most important factors that help keep me healthy.

It may take you awhile to switch over to a less processed diet, but throwing out the most obvious culprits would be a great start.

These would include:
  • -French fries and potato chips
  • -All sodas (both regular and diet, as artificial sweeteners may be more problematic than fructose)
  • -Doughnuts

Healthy Eating Made Easy

Aside from creating potentially toxic byproducts, cooking and processing also depletes the food of valuable micronutrients, which is another reason for eating as much raw food as possible. This includes protein sources such as eggs. Raw whole eggs from organic, pastured chickens are an incredible source of high-quality nutrients that many are deficient in. Raw milk is another good example of a food that is beneficial in its raw state but becomes harmful after it is pasteurized.

By opting for foods that will benefit your health, such as raw, preferably organic and/or locally-grown vegetables, organic grass-fed meats, healthy oils, raw dairy, nuts and seeds, you can change your health for the better. These are the foods that are truly natural, and quite easy to prepare once you get the hang of it.

For a step-by-step guide to make the transition to a healthier diet as simple and smooth as possible, simply follow the advice in my optimized nutrition plan.

AT-M Ad 
Remember, eating fresh whole foods is the “secret” to getting healthier, losing weight and really enjoying your food. It’s unfortunate that so many are under the mistaken belief that it’s “next to impossible” to create a meal without processed foods. Bruce Weinstein and Mark Scarbrough tackle this issue head-on in their book Real Food Has Curves, which is a great starting point to “relearn” the basics of how to enjoy and prepare real food.

Once you get used to it, you’ll find you can whip up a healthful meal from scratch in the same amount of time it would have taken you to drive down the street to pick up fast food. The main difference will be greater satisfaction, both physically and mentally, and perhaps even financially, as processed foods typically end up being more expensive than cooking from scratch.

USA melden Fortschritt bei Wasser-Privatisierung

http://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2014/06/19/usa-melden-fortschritt-bei-wasser-privatisierung/

USA melden Fortschritt bei Wasser-Privatisierung

Die Verhandlungen zum Geheimabkommen TiSA gehen in die siebte Runde. Über den Inhalt ist man sich bereits grundlegend einig, so der US-Vertreter Froman. Das Abkommen strebt eine Privatisierung der Trinkwasser-Versorgung und eine Lockerung der internationalen Leiharbeit an.
Ihren XING-Kontakten zeigen
Der US-Handelsrepräsentant Michael Froman (mi.) verhandelt derzeit die Geheim-Abkommen TTIP, TPP und TiSA. (Foto: dpa)
Der US-Handelsrepräsentant Michael Froman (mi.) verhandelt derzeit die Geheim-Abkommen TTIP, TPP und TiSA. (Foto: dpa)
Die Verhandlungen über ein internationales Abkommens zur Liberalisierung des Dienstleistungssektors kommen offenbar voran. Die Grundzüge für ein solches Vertragswerk seien inzwischen vereinbart, sagte US-Handelsrepräsentant Michael Froman am Mittwoch. Kommende Woche startet die siebte Verhandlungsrunde für das Abkommen zum Handel mit Dienstleistungen (Trade in Services Agreement – Tisa). Die Verhandlungspartner treffen sich vom 23. bis zum 27 Juni in Genf.
Verhandlungspartner sind 50 Staaten, die fast zwei Drittel des globalen Handels mit Dienstleistungen erbringen. Dazu gehören Kommunikation, Finanzdienstleistungen, die Versorgung mit Strom und Trinkwasser, Postdienstleistungen und auch Leiharbeit. An den Tisa-Verhandlungen sind unter anderem die Europäische Union, die USA, Australien, Kanada, Chile, Kolumbien, Costa Rica, Hongkong, Israel, Japan, Südkorea, Mexiko, Neuseeland, Norwegen, Panama, Paraguay, Pakistan, Peru und die Schweiz beteiligt.
In den USA erbringt der Dienstleistungssektor 75 Prozent der Wirtschaftsleistung und sichert 80 Prozent der Jobs in der Privatwirtschaft. In der Europäischen Union (EU) umfasst der Bereich fast 75 Prozent des Bruttoinlandsprodukts und der Beschäftigung.
Kritiker der Tisa-Verhandlungen beklagen, dass die Gespräche unter großer Geheimhaltung geführt werden. Sie befürchten vor allem, dass mit dem Abkommen die Privatisierung von bislang staatlich erbrachten Leistungen zur Grundversorgung der Bevölkerung wie Trinkwasser vorangetrieben und unumkehrbar gemacht werden soll (mehr hier). Außerdem sehen sie die Gefahr, dass die Leiharbeit internationalisiert wird. Das würde es ermöglichen, billige Leiharbeiter in Hochlohnländer zu holen, statt die Produktion in Billiglohnländer zu verlagern.

Montag, 7. Juli 2014

http://www.realfarmacy.com/oregon-man-sent-to-jail-for-catching-rain-water-on-his-own-property/


Oregon Man Sent to Jail for Catching Rain Water on His Own Property


oregn man sqGary Harrington, the Oregon man convicted of collecting rainwater and snow runoff on his rural property surrendered Wednesday morning to begin serving his 30-day, jail sentence in Medford, Ore.
AT-M Ad 

“I’m sacrificing my liberty so we can stand up as a country and stand for our liberty,” Harrington told a small crowd of people gathered outside of the Jackson County (Ore.) Jail.

Several people held signs that showed support for Harrington as he was taken inside the jail.

Harrington was found guilty two weeks ago of breaking a 1925 law for having, what state water managers called “three illegal reservoirs” on his property. He was convicted of nine misdemeanors, sentenced to 30 days in jail and fined over $1500 for collecting rainwater and snow runoff on his property.

The Oregon Water Resources Department, claims that Harrington has been violating the state’s water use law by diverting water from streams running into the Big Butte River.

But Harrington says he is not diverting the state’s water — merely collecting rainwater and snow melt that falls or flows on his own property.

Harrington has vowed to continue to fight the penalty, stating that the government has become “big bullies” and that “from here on in, I’m going to fight it.”

“They’ve just gotten to be big bullies and if you just lay over and die and give up, that just makes them bigger bullies, Harrington said in an interview two weeks ago with CNSNews.com.

“We as Americans, we need to stand on our constitutional rights, on our rights as citizens and hang tough. This is a good country, we’ll prevail,” he said.

AT-M Ad 
His release is expected in early September.

CNSNews.com is not funded by the government like NPR. CNSNews.com is not funded by the government like PBS. 

CNSNews.com relies on individuals like you to help us report the news the liberal media distort and ignore. Please make a tax-deductible gift to CNSNews.com today. Your continued support will ensure that CNSNews.com is here reporting THE TRUTH, for a long time to come.

EU schafft Grundlagen zum Militär-Einsatz gegen die Bürger

http://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/2014/06/28/eu-schafft-grundlagen-zum-militaer-einsatz-gegen-die-buerger/

EU schafft Grundlagen zum Militär-Einsatz gegen die Bürger

Die EU hat eine sogenannte „Solidaritätsklausel“ verabschiedet. Im Fall von Katastrophen oder Terroranschlägen in Mitgliedsstaaten tritt künftig der Bündnisfall ein. Brüssel schafft so den juristischen Rahmen für den europaweiten Einsatz von Polizei- und Militäreinheiten.
Ihren XING-Kontakten zeigen
Die EU hat die rechtlichen Vorraussetzungen für einen Einsatz der Europäische Gendarmerie-Einheit geschaffen. (Foto: dpa)
Die EU hat die rechtlichen Vorraussetzungen für einen Einsatz der Europäische Gendarmerie-Einheit geschaffen. (Foto: dpa)
Die am Dienstag beschlossene „Solidaritätsklausel“ soll es der EU ermöglichen „im Falle von Terroranschlägen, natürlichen oder menschengemachten Katastrophen geschlossen zu handeln“. Die EU schafft dadurch die rechtlichen Rahmen für einen europaweiten Einsatz der Polizei und des Militärs. Die Bedingungen für ein Inkrafttreten der Klausel sind dabei ebenso vage gehalten wie die möglichen Maßnahmen.
„Die gestrige Verabschiedung im Rat für Allgemeine Angelegenheiten geschah im Verborgenen: Der Punkt tauchte nicht in der Tagesordnung des Treffens auf. Die Presse war nicht informiert. Jedoch handelt es sich um eine der umstrittensten Regelungen der EU-Verträge. Genau deshalb war die Ausformulierung der ‚Solidaritätsklausel’ bei der Unterzeichnung des Vertrages von Lissabon auf einen späteren Zeitpunkt verschoben worden“, sagte der Bundestagsabgeordnete der Linken, André Hunko.
Die „Solidaritätsklausel“ kann ein Staat geltend machen, wenn eine Krise seine„Bewältigungskapazitäten eindeutig übersteigt“, wie aus einerStellungnahme des EU-Rats hervorgeht.  Die EU-Staaten müssen dann „alle ihr zur Verfügung stehenden Instrumente“ mobilisieren. Die Rede ist von „operativen, politischen oder finanziellen Instrumenten und Strukturen“. Hierzu gehören auch polizeiliche und militärische Maßnahmen.
Die EU schafft damit einen juristischen Rahmen für den europaweiten Einsatz von Polizei- und Militäreinheiten. Zeitgleich arbeitet die EU-Kommission intensiv an der Schaffung einer einheitlichen EU-Polizeieinheit sowie einer EU-Staatsanwaltschaft (mehr hier).
Die Klausel ist die rechtliche Grundlage für Einsätze polizeilicher Spezialkräfte des ‚ATLAS-Netzwerks’, das von der EU-Kommission aufgebaut wird. Aus Deutschland ist daran die GSG 9 beteiligt. Letztes Jahr durfte die Spezialeinheit der Bundespolizei erstmalig eine über mehrere Länder verteilte ATLAS-Großübung leiten.
Auch der Einsatz der „Europäische Gendarmerie-Truppe“ (EUROGENDFOR) wird durch die „Solidaritätsklausel“ ermöglicht, wie Heiseberichtet. An der Einheit mit Hauptsitz im italienischen Vicenza sind alle EU-Mitgliedstaaten beteiligt, die Gendarmerien, also Polizeieinheiten mit militärischem Status, unterhalten. Zu den Gründerstaaten der EUROGENDFOR zählen Portugal, Spanien, Italien, Frankreich und die Niederlanden. Ihre Dienste bietet die Gendarmerie-Einheit der EU, der NATO oder der UNO an.
Zudem werden die beiden geheimdienstlichen EU-Lagezentren durch die Klausel gestärkt. Dabei handelt es sich um die EU-Geheimdienste EUMS INT und INTCEN, die den EU-Rat regelmäßig bei der „Einschätzung der Bedrohungen“beraten sollen. Die Dienste können dafür auf Geheimdienstmaterial aus den EU-Mitgliedsländern und auf die EU-Satellitenüberwachung zurückgreifen.
„Die ‚Solidaritätsklausel’ ist überflüssig, denn die EU verfügt bereits über Mechanismen zur gegenseitigen Hilfe im Falle von Katastrophen. Zum anderen verstärkt die Klausel den Kurs auf eine Militarisierung der Innenpolitik, da auf Anfrage auch Militär in einem anderen Mitgliedstaat eingesetzt werden kann. Ich befürchte dass es um den innenpolitischen Bündnisfall geht: Der soll gelten, wenn‚schwerwiegende Auswirkungen auf Menschen, die Umwelt oder Vermögenswerte’ drohen. Sogar politisch motivierte Blockaden in den Bereichen Energie, Transport und Verkehr oder Generalstreiks sind mit erfasst“, so Hunko weiter.
Noch strittig ist, wo die „Solidaritätsklausel“ tatsächliche Geltung findet, wie Heiseweiter berichtet. Zu den möglichen Anwendungsgebieten gehören „Landfläche, Binnengewässer, Hoheitsgewässer und Luftraum“ der betreffenden Länder. Es sind aber auch Krisen und Katastrophen erfasst, wenn diese ihren Ursprung „außerhalb des Gebiets der Mitgliedstaaten haben“.
„Ausdrücklich wird auf Krisen Bezug genommen, deren Anlass ‚außerhalb der EU‘ zu suchen sei. Diese Vermischung von innerer und äußerer Sicherheit lehnt die Linksfraktion ab. Statt einer Militarisierung der Innenpolitik durch den Einsatz von Militär im Inneren anderer Mitgliedstaaten, brauchen wir eine Stärkung der zivilen Solidaritätsmechanismen in der EU“, so Hunko weiter.